Torts & ProductsLiability Defense

• Successfully obtained summary judgement in an asbestos products liability case with positive product identification and a $400,000 settlement demand. Worked with the client and former employees to extensively research and collect historical documents for the first time, drafted voluminous interrogatory responses that will be used to secure dismissals in future matters, conducted exposure-limiting cross-examination, and drafted a motion for summary judgment that the plaintiff chose not to oppose.

• Negotiated a settlement on behalf of a reputable law firm and attorney for 3 percent of the originally claimed damages after walking away from a mediation in which the mediator had recommended a settlement for a substantially greater value.

• Successfully obtained a summary judgment dismissal of a premises liability case arising from a trip and fall.

• Successfully obtained a summary judgment dismissal of a products liability case arising from a fall from a ladder sold by retail department store.

• Obtained a dismissal on summary judgment of toxic-tort claims by a worker claiming the need for a lung transplant against a property owner. Also successfully recovered attorney's fees from the tenant.

• Obtained dismissal on summary judgment of professional malpractice and intentional-tort claims against a university client related to student health services.

• Obtained dismissal on summary judgment of professional malpractice and intentional-tort claims against a university client related to student mental health services.

• Obtained dismissal on summary judgment of negligence and employer liability claims against a university client related to a sports club injury.

• Obtained summary judgment for a roofing manufacturer in a living mesothelioma case with only two viable defendants and a settlement demand of over $1 million, saving the client the cost of trial and a potentially large adverse verdict.

• Obtained summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint in a lead poisoning case brought against an insured homeowner client based on the client's lack of notice of a potential hazard in the property. Following the dismissal of the complaint at the trial court level, successfully defended the plaintiff's appeals to the Appellate Division and NYS Court of Appeals.

• Secured a voluntary dismissal for a plumbing contractor in a mesothelioma case involving a young plaintiff with young dependents. The result was based on extensive research and analysis of historical government records to confirm the client was not involved in the construction project at issue and extensive negotiations with opposing counsel. Saved the client the cost of a dispositive motion and potentially dangerous trial verdict.

• Secured a voluntary dismissal for a school bus manufacturer in a mesothelioma case based upon extensive research and analysis of the company's complex corporate history and transactional documents, government sales records, and legal analysis to establish that the client was not liable for the product at issue. Avoided a costly summary judgment motion and established precedential discovery responses and materials for the client to use in defending future litigation.

• Successfully obtained summary judgment for a manufacturing client in an asbestos matter where the plaintiff sought to rely on inadmissible hearsay. The case decision is now routinely relied upon by defendants in NYS asbestos litigation. 

• Defended a utility in a $1 million personal injury action allegedly resulting from a failure to provide municipal lighting.

• Successfully prosecuted appeals to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department and secured summary judgment in favor of an insurance company where the client did not owe any duty to the injured plaintiff.

• Successfully defended defendants in multiple complex construction-related accidents, including defending claims under Labor Law § 240, with verdicts taken through trial.

• Obtained a dismissal of a lawsuit by a student alleging 17 causes of medical malpractice and intentional torts against a private university and its health care center.

• Represented a building owner in a trip-and-fall case involving a 25-year patient of the tenant doctor who allegedly tripped over the hallway runner when exiting the building and whose last demand was for $250,000. The jury found the condition of the vestibule was safe, finding in favor of the client.

• Successfully defended a $170,000 claim by a utilities company for damage to equipment during a construction project.

• Successfully defended a supermarket chain in a premises liability claim for an injury in a grocery store that was affirmed on appeal.

• Successfully obtained a dismissal of a premises liability action against an insurance company after the trial in which the plaintiff sought over $1 million in damages. 

• Obtained summary judgment in a toxic-exposure and NYS Labor Law case with significant injuries claimed.

• Obtained summary-judgment dismissal of a complaint against the county and district attorneys that sought $9 million in damages for malicious prosecution. 

• Defended a homeowner against claims he caused serious injuries to the plaintiff while operating his lawn mower. There was an ongoing boundary line dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant. Following a bifurcated jury trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the defendant, finding that he was not negligent.

• Settled a lawsuit against an energy client arising from alleged wrongful maintenance of a gas tank at the plaintiff's residence.

• Successfully defended at trial a propane gas distribution company from allegations of negligent maintenance and testing of a residential propane tank. The defendant allegedly improperly tested the gas line for leaks, permitting a build-up of propane gas, resulting in an explosion and the death of the occupant. At trial, through the use of a defense expert testimony and witnesses, the jury heard testimony that the fire was not started by an explosion but by another unknown source, which resulted in an explosion of combustibles. Further, the smell of propane, about which the decedent complained, was caused by the decedent’s improper use of the propane system but did not indicate a leak in the system. Two defendants resolved the matter prior to trial. The sole remaining defendant was found not negligent and a no cause was rendered by the jury.

• Prepared and orally argued the motion for summary judgment and prepared the appellate brief to the New York State Appellate Court, Fourth Department in Gorzka v. Insulation Distributors, Inc., et al, which ultimately made law in New York that a plaintiff’s failure to identify a defendant in responses to interrogatories is an admission that the plaintiff was not exposed to the defendant’s products. This is case law routinely relied upon by defendants in asbestos litigation.

Alerts

• EPA Lists Two New "Forever Chemicals" Under CERCLA
• First Department Clarifies Pleading Requirements Under NYS Child Victims Act
• Fourth Department Finds Language in 1980 Statute Is Gender Neutral for Purposes of Child Victims Act
• NYS Governor Hochul Again Vetoes Change to Wrongful Death Statute
• Horseback Rider Assumes Risk of "Green Broke" Horse
• New York Adult Survivors Act Set to Expire
• First Department Affirms Validity of Notice of Claim Filed 11 Months Late
• Appellate Courts Split in Interpretation of New York State's Highway Law Section 139(2)
• Second Department Declines to Expand Scope of Arons
• NYS Appellate Court Dismisses Common Law Claims Against Contractor for Injuries Sustained by "Special Employee"
• Child Victim Act Complaint Dismissed for Failure to Sufficiently Allege Special Duty
• Absent Willful Misconduct, the PREP Act Does Not Provide Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction
• Child Victims Act's Revival Provisions Withstand Constitutional Challenge
• Assumption of Risk and Enhanced Dangers: Issue of Fact Causes Third Department to Reverse Lower Court's Decision in Demolition Derby Case
• Affidavits Lacking Personal Knowledge and Attaching Uncertified Records Have No Probative Value
• Late Claims Against Physician Assistants Do Not Relate Back to Timely Action Against Doctors
• NYS Governor Hochul Vetoes Proposed Grieving Families Act
• Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims Survive Early Dismissal in Child Victim Act Cases
• Moving Defendant Relying on a Complete Defense Need Not Disprove Every Exception
• Federal Court Sanctions Party Where Corporate Representative Answered "I Don't Know" over 100 Times During 30(b)(6) Deposition
• Utility Companies Not Liable for Substations They Do Not Own, Operate, or Supervise
• EPA's Continued Focus and Mandated Reporting on PFAS ("Forever Chemicals")
• Unwitnessed Fall From Ladder Amounts to Mere Speculation of Liability Under Labor Law
• NYS Adult Survivors Act Signed Into Law, Reviving Claims of Sexual Abuse for Adult Victims
• New York State's Highest Court Reaffirms Specific Causation Requirements in Toxic Tort Cases
• When a Stay Is Not a Stay
• Update Regarding Amendments to NYS Insurance Disclosure Laws
• Municipal Employees Need Not Be Named in Notice of Claim
• New York State Enacts New Insurance Disclosure Laws
• Falling Facade Near Construction Zone Creates Issues of Fact
• Second Department Determines Exclusion of Test Results Not Harmless in Medical Malpractice Action
• The Second Department Addresses Whether Cause of Action Sounded in Malpractice or Negligence
• Fourth Department Distinguishes Medical Malpractice From Ordinary Negligence in Nursing Home Case
• Allegations Found Insufficient in Child Abduction and Sexual Assault Case
• To Dismiss or Not to Dismiss? Second Department Takes Another Look at Abandonment
• Second Department Makes a Turn From Lower Court's Collision Decision
• NYS Court Takes Broad View of Foreseeability of a Third-Party Assault
• NY Appellate Court Dismisses Claim for Purely Economic Losses Arising From Motor Vehicle Accident
• SCOTUS Gives Pennsylvania Student Plenty of News to Cheer About in Free Speech Decision
• NYS Governor Cuomo Has Authority to Toll Statutory Time Limitations
• Unlocked Door Not a Proximate Cause of Gang Member Murder
• Grandparent in the Zone of Danger May Bring Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claim
• NYS Appellate Court Affirms Sanctions for Negligent Removal of Online Post
• New Changes to 29 Sections of the NYS Uniform Rules for Supreme and County Courts
• NYS Appellate Court Orders Disclosure of Experts' Financial Compensation
• NYS High Court Holds the Vicious-Propensities Requirement Does Not Apply to Veterinary Clinic
• NYS Governor Cuomo Signs Legislation Strengthening Anti-SLAPP Protections
• NYS Jury Trials and Grand Juries Shut Down Statewide for a Second Time
• US Senate Proposes SAFE TO WORK Act to Protect Schools
• NYS Appellate Court Confirms Low Threshold for Specific Causation Evidence in Toxic Tort Cases
• NYS Appellate Court Issues Decision on Novel Indemnification Claim in Construction Case
• NYS Child Victim Act Look-Back Window Extended to August 14, 2021
• Liability for a Motor Vehicle Accident Requires More Than a NY V&T Violation
• Co-Claimants Not Entitled to Observe GML § 50-h Oral Examinations
• NYS Statutes of Limitation Further Tolled During COVID-19
• NYS COVID-19 Administrative Orders Don't Require Parties to Appear for Remote Depositions
• COVID-19: NYS Further Expands Virtual Courts
• COVID-19: Updates on NYS Courts and US Federal Courts
• NYS Attorneys Not Liable for Failing to Act Outside Scope of Engagement
• COVID-19: NYS Virtual Courts up and Running, Regular Courts Open for Essential, Emergency Proceedings
• COVID-19: New NYS Executive Order Issued, Courts Implement Virtual Court Proceedings
• COVID-19: New NYS Executive Order Limits Medical Professionals' Civil Liability
• COVID-19: NYS Statutes of Limitation Extended, Court Activity Halted
• COVID-19: All Connecticut State Court Deadlines Extended Indefinitely
• COVID-19 Forces Connecticut and Massachusetts State and Federal Courts to Limit Activity
• COVID-19 Update: NYS Courts Announce Further Reduction in Court Activity and Relaxation of Discovery Schedules
• COVID-19 Forces New York State and Federal Courts to Reduce Traffic
• NY Plaintiffs Still Unable to Recover Directly Against Third Parties
• NY Appellate Court Holds Agreed-Upon Summary Trial Rules Trump Court Authority
• NY Appellate Court Holds Adult Children Have No Legal Duty of Care for Their Parents
• NYS Courts to Implement Early Mandatory Mediation
• Second Department Allows for Unified Trials; Rules Bifurcation Not a Requirement
• Appellate Division Affirms Victory for Insurers by Precluding Claims Representative's Testimony
• Third Department Narrows Liability Under Labor Law § 240(1)
• Coke Ovens May Be Subject to Strict Products Liability
• NY Court of Appeals Expands Optional Safety Equipment Defense for Design Defect Claims
• Unexecuted Indemnification Agreement Not Retroactive Once Executed
• US Supreme Court Strikes Down "Bare Metal" Defense and Expands Manufacturers' Duty to Warn in Maritime Products Liability Case
• Unanimous Supreme Court Rigid on Missed Appeal Deadline
• Child Victims Act Signed Into Law, Extending Statute of Limitations for Victims of Sexual Abuse
• Assumption of Risk Does Not Save Landowner From Claims of Hidden or Uncommon Defects on Playing Field
• Indemnification Provision in Alarm-Monitoring Contract Valid Despite Unresolved Questions of Fact Regarding Gross Negligence
• No Prejudgment Interest if Plaintiff Cannot Show When Damages Were Incurred
• Notable Talc Case May Increase Similar Claims
• School Districts May Assume Heightened Duty Toward Students Based on Implementation of Policies and Procedures
• Informed Intermediary Doctrine Not Applicable to Industrial Employer and Its Employees
• The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 Reinstates Limits on Medicaid's Third-Party Rights to Settlement Awards
• Plaintiff Seeking Summary Judgment on Liability Need Not Establish Lack of Comparative Fault
• The New York Court of Appeals Takes Stance on Discovery of Private Social Media Accounts
• Plaintiff's Uncertainty on Causation Creates a Question of Fact in New York Labor Law § 240 (1) Case
• Assumption Of The Risk Did Not Apply Where Golfer Failed To Yell Fore Before Taking A Mulligan
• Potential Fifty Year Statute of Limitations For Civil Claims For Sexual Offenses
• Precautionary "Wet Floor" Signs Do Not Imply Actual or Constructive Notice of a Slippery Condition
• Appellate Division First Department Reaffirms "Interfamilial Immunity" From Contribution
• Plaintiffs Are Entitled To Prompt Payment Of A Settlement, But Non-Parties Are Not
• Case-by-Case Analysis Required for Sports-Related Personal Injury Cases
• General Obligations Law § 5-335 Prohibits Insurer's Reduction in Disability Benefits
• The U.S. Supreme Court Recently Narrowed States' Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction
• New York Court Holds That Privileged Statement to Insurer May be Discoverable
• General Release Failed to Prevent Future Third-Party Personal Injury Claim For Contribution and Indemnification
• Appellate Divisions Affirm Dismissals in Pair of Domestic Animal Injury Cases
• U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Tribal Employee's Claim of Sovereign Immunity
• No Apportionment of Fault Where the State Occupies the "Empty Chair"
• New Cybersecurity Regulations May Apply to Companies that do Business with NYS Chartered Or Licensed Banks, Mortgage Bankers, Insurance Companies and Others
• The Burdens of Proof When Petitioner Moves to Serve Late Notice of Claim
• New York Court of Appeals to Decide Whether Substance Abuse Facility Owes Duty to Third-Parties When Releasing a Patient
• Fourth Department Signals Expansion of Sole Proximate Cause Defense
• Appellate Division Denies Adjoining Landowner's Motion for Summary Judgment in the Case of Police Officer Injured on a Public Sidewalk
• New York's High Court Finds Spectator Brawl Was Not Foreseeable
• Prejudgment Interest Denied Where Stipulation on Liability is Silent on Interest
• State vs. Federal Appeals: Practice Points for Appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
• Court Of Appeals Significantly Expands Manufacturer's Duty To Warn
• The Admissibility of Social Media Evidence: Overcoming the Authentication Requirement
• "Trip-And-Fall" Complaint Dismissed Against Third-Party Installer of Holiday Display at Mall
• New York's Highest Court Set to Clarify Years of Conflicting Precedent in Product Liability Cases
• New York Court Of Appeals Rejects "Reverse Engineering" Method Of Reaching Expert Opinion On Causation In Toxic Tort Case
• A Moral Duty Does Not Equate With A Legal Duty; One Does Not Owe A Duty To Come To The Aid Of A Person In Peril
• Medical Provider Exposed To Malpractice Liability Where Plaintiff Fell From Examination Table
• New York Appellate Court Provides Guidance as to Value of Cervical Spine Surgery
• U.S. District Court Potentially Expands The Reach Of Prenatal Tort Liability
• Legionnaire's Disease Outbreak In Bronx Fast Tracks Legislation, Sets Table For Tort Liability of Building Owners
• New Federal Regulations Mandate Leases for Motor Carriers of Passengers
• Attorney Disqualification Not Warranted For Failure To Work For The Best Interest Of Corporate Principals
• Court of Appeals Finds Owners of Domestic Animals Not Liable Under Ordinary Negligence Principles
• Third Department Reaffirms That Falling Objects Do Not Create Automatic Liability Under Labor Law §240 (1)
• New York Court of Appeals Affirms Appellate Division Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Establish a Serious Injury Under Insurance Law 5102
• Appellate Division Dismisses Trip-and-Fall Complaint Where Plaintiff Could Not Identify Cause of Fall
• Impermissible Jury Compromise Results in New Trial
• Homeowners Fail To Prove Well-Water Contamination Caused By Natural Gas Drilling
• General Release Signed Prior to Filing Lawsuit Did Not Contemplate All of Plaintiffs Injuries
• New York Federal Court Limits Protection for Motor Vehicle Owner-Lessors Under the "Graves Amendment"
• New York Appellate Division Clarifies Spoliation Issues When Surveillance Video is not Preserved
• New York Federal Court Restricts Application of Runner Doctrine: Labor Law 240(1) Inapplicable When Object Is Not on a Fall or Descent
• Appellate Division, First Department Creates a Defamation by Implication Standard
• Appellate Division Affirms Dismissal of Negligence Claim Against Municipality Providing Emergency Medical Services
• Police Encounter with Dog Walker Leads to Important Ruling on Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 Offers of Judgment in Civil Litigation
• U.S. Supreme Court Defines Standing Test For False Advertising Claims Under the Lanham Act
• Exclusivity of Workers' Compensation Law Trumps Vicarious Liability of Vehicle Owner
• N.Y. Court of Appeals: Employers Are Entitled To Workers' Compensation Law Protection For Undocumented Alien Employees
• Court of Appeals Rejects Tenant's Personal Injury Mold Claims
• Missing Witness Charge Unavoidable When Arguing Testimony Is Cumulative Of Opponent's Evidence
• Court of Appeals Unanimously Reverses Its Own Prior Ruling; No Collateral Estoppel Effect of Workers' Compensation Board Rulings
• Failure To Produce Treadmill Results in Spoliation Sanctions
• "Cause-In-Fact" Analysis Adds Protection For Builders, Developers and Architects in Catastrophic Event Matters
• Second Circuit Certifies Workers' Compensation Derivative Liability Question to New York Court of Appeals
• Owners of Domestic Animals May Be Held Liable Under Ordinary Tort Principles
• Emergency Medical Services to the General Public Considered a Governmental Function
• Demand for the Preservation of Electronic Evidence: A Valuable Tool for Accessing Interactive Health Data in Tort Cases
• Keepers and Owners of Farm Animals May Now Be Liable Under Ordinary Tort Principles
• New York Court of Appeals Considers Viability of Medical Monitoring Claims
• Mandate Requiring an Automatic External Defibrillator (AED) and a Trained Operator On Site Does Not Create an Affirmative Duty to Use the Device
• Collateral Estoppel Precludes Plaintiff From Relitigating Duration Of Disability
• Second Department Holds That Medicare Act Preempts General Obligations Law
  § 5-335
• High Standard Of Proof Of Causation In Toxic Tort Cases For Plaintiffs' Experts
• Summary Judgment Granted To School District In Negligent Supervision Case
• Abacus Highlights Significance Of Waiver-Of-Subrogation Clauses
• Court of Appeals Reaffirms Assumption of the Risk Doctrine in Sports-Related Injury Cases
• Plaintiff's Expert Not Required to Directly Rebut Defendants' Expert in Order to Defeat Summary Judgment
• Court of Appeals Declines to Expand Interpretation of Labor Law § 240 (1)
• UPDATE: Recent New York Decisions Demonstrate the Need for Extreme Caution When Addressing Settlements Involving Medicare Issues
• Contractual Authority to Supervise and Control Alone is Insufficient to Merit Indemnification
• Recent New York Decisions Demonstrate the Need for Extreme Caution When Addressing Settlements Involving Medicare Issues
• "Sun Glare" Driver Not Entitled to an Emergency Doctrine Jury Instruction
• Federal Maritime Law Preempts New York State Law for Claims Brought Against the Owners of Vessels on Navigable Waters
• Failure to File Summons is Not Correctable Irregularity Under CPLR 2001
• Reckless Disregard Standard Only Applies to the Specific Conduct Set Forth in that Statute
• Public Bus Company Under Contract to Transport Students is not Bound by Safety Requirements Imposed on Standard Yellow School Bus
• Lack of Precision in Pleading Results in Waiver of Affirmative Defense
• Pre-Arbitration Award Interest Available to Plaintiffs if Liability Previously Determined by Jury
• Court of Appeals Overrules Labor Law §240(1) Dismissal
• Golfer Who Failed to Shout "Fore" Prior to Taking His Shot Not Liable for Injuries Sustained by Another Golfer
• New York Court of Appeals Holds No Third-Party Liability Exists For Corporate Misdeeds
• Owners of Improperly Parked Vehicles may be Liable for Injuries Sustained by Pedestrians Struck by Cars
• Court Applies Storm in Progress Rule to Dismiss Personal Injury Action Involving a Slip and Fall Occurring in the Lobby of a Building
• Labor Law §240(1) Claim Dismissed
• Severe Sanctions Imposed for Failure to Preserve, Collect and Produce Electronic Discovery
• Court of Appeals Holds That Defendant's Stipulation to a Trial Court's Damages Additur
• First Department Declines to Hold Signal by a Driver as a Proximate Cause of an Automobile Accident
• New York's Highest Court Refuses to Expand the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk
• Exposure for Identity Theft: Data Privacy Breaches and State and Federal Data Security Laws
• New York's Highest Court Addresses Whether Strict Liability under Labor Law §240(1) Attaches Where Plaintiff's Injuries are Neither the Result of a Falling Worker nor a Falling Object
• New Legislation Bars Health Providers' Right to Subrogation in Personal Injury Settlements
• The Cover Up is Worse than the Crime
• The Danger of Inadvertent Admissions and the Importance of Careful Pleading
• Assumption of Risk: Appellate Division Gives Expansive Reading of Danger Invites Rescue
• New York's Highest Court Permits Vicariously Liable Owner to Shift Entire Loss to Contractor under Common Law Indemnification.
• Federal Appellate Court Disregards Stipulation in Class Action Suit.
• Homeowners Acting As Their Own General Contractor
• New York Court of Appeals Reaffirms Strict Liability in Domestic Animal Cases
• Third Department Dismisses Wrongful Death Action Against a Property Owner Where the Decedent was a Trespasser
• New York's Highest Court Requires Strict Compliance with Prior Written Notice Statute
• Supreme Court Limits Preemptive Effect of FDA Labeling
• Third Department Declines to Follow Second and Fourth Department's Expansion of the Doctrine of Primary Assumption of the Risk
• Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme and County Courts are Amended to Address Electronic Discovery
• Insurer May Intervene To Enforce Equitable Subrogation Rights
• Service of Process Abroad
• New York's Highest Court Reverses Ruling that Imposed Forfeiture of $750,000 for Failure to Timely Submit a Judgment.
• Employer Found not Vicariously Liable for Employee Car Accidents in Employer's Parking Lot After the End of the Workday.
• New York's Highest Court Addresses Whether Consumer Acceptability Of An Alternative Design Is An Element Of A Negligent Design Claim

Press Releases

• Yassine Sahbani Joins Barclay Damon
• Kaity McClaine Joins Barclay Damon
• Cory Poplawski Joins Barclay Damon
• Matt Smith Joins Barclay Damon
• Samantha McDermott Joins Barclay Damon
• Six Barclay Damon Attorneys Named Empire State Counsel® Honorees
• Barclay Damon Lands Insurance Litigator Jacqueline Doody
• Bridget Daley Joins Barclay Damon
• Xun Chen Joins Barclay Damon
• Barclay Damon Welcomes C. J. Englert
• Three Law Clerks Named Associates After Admission to New York State Bar in January 2023
• Nick Pompeo Joins Barclay Damon
• Meghan Tuma Joins Barclay Damon
• Earl Storrs III Joins Barclay Damon
• Nick Constantino Joins Barclay Damon
• Daniel Martucci Joins Barclay Damon
• Barclay Damon Welcomes Benjamin Zakarin
• Andrew Carroll and Mary Connolly Join Barclay Damon
• Daniel Coleman and David Hutter Join Barclay Damon
• Ryan Altieri Named Associate After Admission to New York State Bar
• Attorney Oliver Young Joins Barclay Damon

News

• Jacqui Doody Featured in Law360 Article About Joining Barclay Damon
• The Brief Case: "Trucking Company's Accident Reconstruction Expert Excluded as Spoliation Sanction for Company's Failure to Preserve Truck After Fatal Accident"
• Mark Whitford Featured in Rochester Business Journal Article on Becoming Managing Director of Barclay Damon's Rochester Office
• Corey Auerbach and Peter Marlette Featured in Buffalo Business First Article on Managing Director Role
• Ari Kwiatkowski Interviewed for Buffalo Business First Article on the Consequences of Violating a Travel Ban for Employers and Employees
• Attorneys Published in Winter 2021/2022 USLAW Magazine
• Tom Cronmiller Co-Presents at URMIA Boston 2019 Conference

Publications

• 2020 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2019 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2018 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2017 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2016 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2015 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2014 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2013 Transportation Annual Year in Review
• 2012 Transportation Annual Year in Review

Blog Posts

• NY Appellate Court Suspends Rudolph Giuliani on Interim Basis From Practice of Law