Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

March 17, 2009

Court of Appeals Permits Partial Contractual Indemnification

It is well known that New York General Obligations Law § 5-322.1, as in most states, precludes a party from being indemnified for its own negligence. Historically, it seemed clear from the cases that the statute meant two things: (1) that a party could not be indemnified for any liability attributable to its own negligence; and (2) that a purely non-negligent party could obtain full indemnification from those parties with whom it contracted. That is to say that indemnification was either zero or 100%.

However, until recently it was unclear whether a partially negligent party could obtain indemnification for that portion of liability for which it was not responsible. For example, if an owner was found 10% negligent, could it seek indemnification from a contractor for the remainder of its liability (90%)? This issue was recently put to rest in the affirmative in a recent decision from the Court of Appeals.

In Brooks v. Judlau Contracting, Inc., 11 N.Y.3d 204 (2008), the Court of Appeals concluded that a party can seek partial indemnification from another party, so long as the contract does not attempt to indemnify the party for its own negligence.

In order to obtain partial indemnification, the contractual provision should state that indemnification is permitted "to the fullest extent permitted by law." The Court of Appeals expressly noted that such language shows an intention by the parties to limit indemnification to that portion of liability for which the indemnitee is not negligent. Lower appellate courts have also held that a provision stating "regardless of whether or not the claim is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder" also expresses an intention to permit partial indemnification. See e.g. Dutton v. Charles Pankow Builders, Ltd., 296 A.D.2d 321 (1st Dep't 2002).

Based on the foregoing, the newly clarified current state of the law in New York is that if a party is found partially negligent it can obtain partial or proportional contractual indemnification from the party with whom it contracted, so long as the agreement includes the language cited above.

It should be noted that the standard AIA forms (A201 relating to Owner/Contractor agreements and A401 relating to Contractor/Subcontractor agreements) include both key phrases, i.e. "to the fullest extent permitted by law" and the "regardless if caused by a party indemnified hereunder." Consequently, when enforcing AIA contracts, courts in New York should permit partial indemnification.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

Supreme Court Declines to Clarify Impact of Uninjured Class Members on Class Certification—For Now

Alerts

EPA Issues Memorandum Reminding States and Tribes of Their Limited Authority Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act

Alerts

Non-Judicial Collateral Remedies, Part 2 – Sale of Collateral

Alerts

NYS Court of Appeals Applies the Assumption of Risk Doctrine to One Golf Course Injury but Not Another

Alerts

Bankruptcy Avoidance Actions, Part 2 – Fraudulent Transfers

Alerts

NYS Court of Appeals: CVA Plaintiff Must Prove Notice of Abuse Applying Then-Prevailing Standards in Decades-Old Sexual Abuse Case