Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

November 28, 2023

Horseback Rider Assumes Risk of "Green Broke" Horse

Under New York law, a participant in a recreational activity such as horseback riding assumes risks that are inherent in and arise out of the nature of the activity. Specifically, New York courts have generally found that in sporting events involving horses, these inherent risks include injuries arising out of the sudden and unintended actions of the horse, including those actions that result in the participant being thrown or falling. A sporting participant is not, however, deemed to have assumed the risks of conditions caused by the defendant’s negligence that are unique or greater than the participant’s skill and experience.

In Stanhope v. Burke,i the plaintiff sustained injuries when he was bucked off a horse. The motion court denied the owner’s motion for summary judgment premised upon the assumption of the risk doctrine. Instead, the court found that issues of fact existed as to whether the horse at issue posed risks that were above and beyond those known by the plaintiff, particularly because the plaintiff was allegedly unaware the horse was “green broke,” meaning the horse required additional saddle training, and had previously been “spooked” under certain circumstances.

On appeal, the Appellate Division, Third Department, reversed, holding that the primary assumption of the risk doctrine barred the plaintiff’s claims. The court found that the plaintiff had significant exposure to horses such that he could appreciate the inherent risks involved in horseback riding. Meanwhile, there was no evidence the defendant concealed that the horse at issue was “green broke” or otherwise increased or concealed the risks associated with riding the horse. Indeed, the evidence established the plaintiff was well acquainted with the horse, familiar with its ongoing training, and had previously groomed and ridden it.

The Stanhope decision illustrates the fine line between risks that are assumed and those that are concealed or increased. Practitioners litigating personal injury claims arising out of recreational activities must thoroughly assess and examine the plaintiff’s knowledge, skill, and experience both generally and specifically to the instrumentalities or conditions at issue to determine whether the primary assumption of the risk doctrine applies.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact David Fulvio, counsel, at dfulvio@barclaydamon.com; Matthew Larkin, Torts & Products Liability Defense Practice Area chair, at mlarkin@barclaydamon.com; or another member of the firm’s Torts & Products Liability Defense Practice Area.
                                                                                     

i2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5427 (3d Dep’t. 2023).
 

Featured Media

Alerts

NYS Department of Health Publishes Amended Proposed Cybersecurity Regulations for Hospitals

Alerts

FTC Noncompete Rule Survives—For Now

Alerts

New York Trial Court Finds Uber Is Not Vicariously Liable for Driver's Negligence

Alerts

ERISA Forfeiture Lawsuits: Navigating the Emerging Legal Landscape

Alerts

EU Leads the Way on Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Alerts

End of An Era: SCOTUS Overturns Chevron After 40 Years of Deference to Administrative Agencies

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out