Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

February 8, 2022

New York State Limits Insurers' Rights to Refuse Homeowners' Policies Based on Dog Breed

Effective January 28, 2022, New York State amended the New York Insurance Law by adding a new section 3421, prohibiting any homeowners’ insurer from considering the breed of an insured’s dog during the underwriting process.  

The new section 3421 seeks to address the historical practice among some insurers of refusing to issue homeowners’ policies, or charging higher premiums, if an insured owns certain dog breeds, such as pit bull terriers. Insurers are now prohibited from refusing to issue or renew, cancelling, or charging higher premiums “based solely upon harboring or owning any dog of a specific breed or mixture of breeds.”

On the other hand, the new section 3421 contains a specific exception if the dog is designated as a “dangerous dog” under New York Agriculture and Markets Law § 123. This exception is fairly limited in its application, though, as the designation of a dog as a “dangerous dog” requires a judicial determination that either the dog has already attacked a person, companion animal, or farm animal or the dog poses a “serious and unjustified imminent threat of serious physical injury or death.”  

Between the blanket prohibition of underwriting solely based on breed and the single exception for dogs that have either bitten or are an imminent threat lies a population of dogs that have been specifically bred for their aggressive tendencies and pose a significant risk of injury. The new section 3421 does not address the risks posed by that population of dogs; it remains to be seen whether further clarification from the Department of Financial Services will clarify how these risks can be accurately underwritten.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Joe Wilson, counsel, at jwilson@barclaydamon.com; Tony Piazza, Insurance Coverage & Regulation Practice Area chair, at apiazza@barclaydamon.com; or another member of the firm’s Insurance Coverage & Regulation Practice Area.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

Confusion Regarding New NYS OMH Regulations for MHOTRS Providers May Present Crisis Billing Take-Back Risk

Alerts

Connecticut Joins the Ranks of States Proposing Landmark AI Legislation

Alerts

NYS PSC Modifies Pole Attachment Rules to Accelerate Broadband and Cellular Service Deployment

Alerts

NYS Department of Health Publishes Amended Proposed Cybersecurity Regulations for Hospitals

Alerts

FTC Noncompete Rule Survives—For Now

Alerts

New York Trial Court Finds Uber Is Not Vicariously Liable for Driver's Negligence

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out