Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

News

January 25, 2017

Law360: Strategies for Avoiding Institution of an IPR

As the five-year anniversary approaches for American Invents Act inter partes reviews at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the available statistics confirm that a patent owner's best chance at avoiding cancellation of its claims is to avoid
institution of the proceeding in the first place. Once an IPR has been instituted, the chances for survival of instituted claims drops dramatically. Accordingly, arguments and evidence presented in a patent owner's preliminary response to the petition[1] should be carefully crafted to convince the PTAB that there is not a reasonable likelihood that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable. Fortunately, for patent owners, there have been a number of developments in the past few years that have improved their chances at avoiding institution.

First, the rule changes adopted by the PTAB in April 2016 now allow patent owners to include supporting evidence in the form of new testimonial evidence (e.g., expert testimony) in preliminary responses to the petition.[2] While genuine issues of material fact created by such testimonial evidence will be viewed in a light most favorable to the petitioner,[3] the ability to challenge testimonial evidence presented in the petition and to present new evidence to support the patentability of the challenged claims greatly increases the chances for a denial of institution.

Read the full article, written by Partner Denis J. Sullivan, here.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

NYS Energy Planning Board Releases Draft Energy Plan, Detailing Pathways to Decarbonization While Maintaining System Reliability Through 2040

Alerts

Non-Judicial Collateral Remedies, Part 3 – Strict Foreclosure

Alerts

Court to Weigh Key Privacy Issues in Web Tracking Case Against Cigna

Alerts

Attention Providers! OMIG Adopts 12-Month Review Period for Newly Initiated Compliance Program Reviews Beginning July 1, 2025

Alerts

New York Court Upholds NYSDEC's Finding That a Title V Renewal Application Was Consistent With the CLCPA

Alerts

New York Public Service Commission Determines to Withdraw Its Finding in the New York City Offshore Wind Public Policy Transmission Need Process