Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

PressRelease

March 18, 2026

Connecticut Appellate Court Upholds $16.8 Million Jury Verdict for Party Depot Owners

Barclay Damon announces that the Connecticut Appellate Court has upheld a $16.8 million jury verdict in favor of the owners of Party Depot in litigation arising from the construction of a commercial building addition in Danbury, Connecticut. The decision was issued by a panel consisting of Judges Seeley, Wilson, and Keller in the consolidated appeals of John Girolametti, Jr., et al. v. James R. Larrabee et al., 238 Conn. App. 1 (2026). 

The case arose from the construction of a large addition intended for wholesale storage and sales displays at Party Depot’s Danbury retail location. After the project was completed, the owners discovered serious structural and safety deficiencies in violation of the building code that rendered the space unusable for its intended purpose. Following extensive litigation and a five-week trial before Judge Pierson, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $16.8 million for the plaintiffs. The Appellate Court scrutinized all of the statutory and factual arguments of the city and its building official and rejected all those arguments except for a $280,000 remittitur ordered for money received from a settling party long prior to the trial. The Appellate Court in its 72-page decision approvingly quoted at length from the jury charges of Judge Pierson on the concepts of “reckless disregard for health and safety” under Conn. Gen. Statute 52-557n. The Appellate Court further approvingly quoted at length from the owners’ expert and fact testimony in rejecting all the claims of legally insufficient evidence raised by the city. The judgment has been remanded to the Complex Litigation Court in Waterbury for adjustment and then for the addition of statutory interest at 10 percent per annum, which would bring the current indebtedness of the city to over $20 million dollars. 

Brian J. Donnell, a partner at Barclay Damon and lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said, “The Appellate Court’s decision affirms what the jury recognized after hearing weeks of evidence—that our clients were left with a building addition and improvements that never should have been approved or constructed under the building code as it was, but the city knowingly and recklessly approved it anyway.” Donnell continued, “This ruling reinforces that municipalities and building officials can and must be held accountable when public safety and building code requirements are recklessly disregarded.”

The ruling represents a significant victory for John and Cindy Girolametti, the owners of the family business, after over a decade of litigation, and it underscores Barclay Damon’s commitment to achieving results for our clients in complex, high-stakes cases.

Barclay Damon attorneys team across offices and practices to provide customized, targeted solutions grounded in industry knowledge and a deep understanding of our clients' businesses. With over 300 attorneys, Barclay Damon is a leading regional law firm that operates from a strategic platform of offices in Albany, Boston, Buffalo, New Haven, New York City, Rochester, Syracuse, Washington DC, and Toronto. Our firm serves clients across the country and, for some practices, provides US legal services around the globe. For more information, visit our award-winning website at Homepage | Barclay Damon.
 

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Regulations Struck Down

Alerts

Proposed Changes to NYISO Deliverability Could Cut Upstate Transmission Upgrade Costs by Nearly $1 Billion

Alerts

Amendment to the New York Trapped at Work Act Provides Employers With Clarity and Time to Comply

Alerts

New York's Medical Aid in Dying Act: What Patients and Health Care Providers Need to Know

Alerts

Second Department Holds That COVID-Era Executive Orders Toll CVA Revival Window

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Aaron See, Ashley Tesch, Tara Mueller, Mary Ann Deinnocentes, and Judith Palaez—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits