Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

April 13, 2017

A New Pitfall for Licensors of Multicomponent Inventions - the Supreme Court's Life Techs Decision

In a recent decision affecting patent licensing, the Supreme Court addressed whether companies can be liable for patent infringement caused by domestically manufacturing a single component of a multicomponent invention, and then internationally assembling it with other components. Life Techs. Corp. v. Promega Corp., 197 L. Ed. 2d 33 (U.S. 2017). The Supreme Court held that a single component does not give rise to such liability, reversing the decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. As described below, this decision of the Supreme Court creates a new pitfall for licensors and calls for creative approaches to license agreement provisions.

In this case, Promega Corporation ("Promega") was the exclusive licensee of a patent that covered a diagnostic kit for genetic testing. Promega sublicensed the patent to Life Technologies Corporations and its subsidiaries ("Life Techs"). The license was restricted to the manufacture and sale of the kit in law enforcement fields. The patented kit included five components, one of which was Taq polymerase. Life Techs manufactured the Taq polymerase component in the United States and then shipped that component to the United Kingdom, where it was combined with the other four components. When Life Techs began selling the kit outside of the law enforcement field, Promega brought a suit against Life Techs for patent infringement. Promega alleged that Life Techs' supply of the single component constituted infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1) of the Patent Act. Life Techs denied such infringement on the basis that the single component was not a "substantial portion" of the patented invention.

The article can be found here: New Strategies For Licensing Of Multicomponent Inventions

Featured Media

Alerts

EPA Issues Memorandum Reminding States and Tribes of Their Limited Authority Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act

Alerts

Non-Judicial Collateral Remedies, Part 2 – Sale of Collateral

Alerts

NYS Court of Appeals Applies the Assumption of Risk Doctrine to One Golf Course Injury but Not Another

Alerts

Bankruptcy Avoidance Actions, Part 2 – Fraudulent Transfers

Alerts

NYS Court of Appeals: CVA Plaintiff Must Prove Notice of Abuse Applying Then-Prevailing Standards in Decades-Old Sexual Abuse Case

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Darnell Williams, Tanisia Bowman, Dominique Tompkins, Kimberly Miller, and Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits