Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

June 7, 2017

New Proposed Rules Allow Nursing Homes To Use Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements

On June 6, 2017, the Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed a new rule allowing Nursing Homes to use pre-dispute arbitration agreements, including as a condition for admission. CMS had previously issued a ban on such agreements in November of last year. That ban never went into effect due to the issuance of a temporary injunction by a federal judge in Mississippi. The injunction was sought by nursing home advocates who successfully argued that CMS overstepped its authority in issuing the ban, and that the ban violated the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). CMS initially appealed the issuance of the injunction but withdrew its appeal this past Friday.

CMS's new rules still address arbitration agreements but in a more narrowly tailored way. The new proposed rules require nursing homes to fully explain arbitration agreements to residents and/or their legal representatives. Also, arbitration agreements must be written in plain language rather than complex legal terms so that residents can easily understand them, and they cannot contain language that discourages residents from communicating with federal, state or local officials. Facilities must also post notices describing their arbitration policies in plain language for residents and visitors to see.

The use of arbitration agreements is becoming more commonplace in the nursing home arena given the ever increasing number of costly lawsuits. Nursing home advocates argue that the arbitration process is superior to traditional litigation because it is much faster and allows the parties to be more directly involved in the process and eventual resolution.

CMS advised it will publish its revised rules on June 8, 2017. 


If you have questions or require further assistance regarding the information contained in this Legal Alert and the impact on your organization, please contact Eric C. Naegely at enaegely@barclaydamon.com or Susan A. Benz, Co-Chair of the Barclay Damon Health Care & Human Services Practice Area at sbenz@barclaydamon.com or Melissa M. Zambri, Co-Chair of the Barclay Damon Health Care & Human Services Practice Area at mzambri@barclaydamon.com.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

COVID-19 Business Interruption Update: New York High Court Affirms in Favor of Insurer

Alerts

USFWS Introduces General Permit for Bald and Golden Eagle Incidental Take

Alerts

ORES Executive Director Issues First Denial of Section 94-C Permit Application Following Applicant's Partial Loss of Site Control

Alerts

New Details About OPWDD Spending in the New York State FY 2025 Executive Budget

Alerts

Second Circuit Reverses in Favor of Insured in $600,000 Fire Loss Case

Alerts

New York State Minimum Wage Increases Are Here: Are You Compliant?

We're Growing in DC!

We’re excited to announce Barclay Damon’s combination with Washington DC–based Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram. SLS’s 10 lawyers, three paralegals, and four administrative staff will join Barclay Damon while maintaining their current office in DC’s central business district. Our clients will benefit from SLS’s corporate, real estate, finance, and construction litigation experience and national energy-industry profile, and their clients from our full range of services.

Read More

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out