Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

February 12, 2009

New York's Highest Court Reverses Ruling that Imposed Forfeiture of $750,000 for Failure to Timely Submit a Judgment.

Rule 202.48 of the Uniform Rules for the New York State Trial Courts requires the winner of a decision containing a directive to "submit" or "settle" the order or judgment to so act within sixty days. Under the Rule, failure to timely submit under such circumstances and without "good cause," constitutes an abandonment of the judgment.

In a widely publicized 2007 decision in Farkas v. Farkas, which involved a contentious matrimonial matter, the First Department held that a $750,000 award must be forfeited because the plaintiff failed to timely submit a judgment under Rule 202.48.

The Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal and recently issued its decision. New York's Highest Court overturned the First Department's decision on the basis that that an earlier decision of the trial court authorized the award "without further order." In the eyes of the Court of Appeals, this language made the settlement process set forth in the Rule unnecessary.

To avoid the potential forfeiture of an award and favorable decision, the safer practice is to ensure that proposed orders are submitted with in the 60 day time period set forth in Rule 202.48.

If you require further information regarding the information presented in this Legal Alert and its impact on your organization, please contact any of the members of the Practice Area.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

Fourth Department Finds Language in 1980 Statute Is Gender Neutral for Purposes of Child Victims Act

Alerts

Priority of Federal Tax Lien on Personal Property: Secured Lender vs. IRS

Alerts

COVID-19 Business Interruption Update: New York High Court Affirms in Favor of Insurer

Alerts

USFWS Introduces General Permit for Bald and Golden Eagle Incidental Take

Alerts

ORES Executive Director Issues First Denial of Section 94-C Permit Application Following Applicant's Partial Loss of Site Control

Alerts

New Details About OPWDD Spending in the New York State FY 2025 Executive Budget

We're Growing in DC!

We’re excited to announce Barclay Damon’s combination with Washington DC–based Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram. SLS’s 10 lawyers, three paralegals, and four administrative staff will join Barclay Damon while maintaining their current office in DC’s central business district. Our clients will benefit from SLS’s corporate, real estate, finance, and construction litigation experience and national energy-industry profile, and their clients from our full range of services.

Read More

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out