Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

May 22, 2023

Appellate Division, Third Department, Denies Appeal and Upholds Office of Renewable Energy Siting Regulations

As we previously reported, in 2021, multiple municipalities and interest groups filed an Article 78 petition against the New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting (ORES) challenging its recently promulgated permitting and siting regulations under Section 94-c of the New York Executive Law. 

On October 7, 2021, Judge Peter Lynch of the Albany County Supreme Court issued a ruling dismissing the petition and upholding the ORES regulations. Petitioners subsequently appealed to the Appellate Division, Third Department. 

On May 18, 2023, the Appellate Division, Third Department, denied the petitioners’ appeal, similarly upholding the ORES regulations. In dismissing the appeal, the court found, among other issues, that:

  1. While ORES did initially misclassify their promulgation of permitting and sitting regulations as an unlisted action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) rather than a Type I action, that misclassification did not invalidate ORES’s SEQRA-negative declaration. 
  2. ORES complied with the SEQRA hard-look test through a variety of actions, including drafting a short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), holding seven public hearings, responding to extensive public comments, consulting with other agencies and an outside consultant on the regulations, and issuing an amended short EAF.
  3. ORES did not exceed its statutory authority, as Executive Law § 94-c directs ORES to issue regulations “to implement the siting permit program,” which ORES did; the adoption of these regulations by ORES was not part of a deferred or segmented review. 
  4. ORES’s ability to preempt local laws, known as the waiver provision, does not violate the New York State Constitution or the Home Rule Provision because ORES’s preemption power is a general law, applying uniformly to all municipalities. Moreover, energy infrastructure siting is a matter of state concern that applies to the state as a whole, and the upheld ORES regulations do not single out any of the petitioner municipalities.

Regardless of whether the petitioners pursue an appeal of the decision to the New York State Court of Appeals, without any injunction in place, the ORES regulations would remain in effect during any resulting appeal, as they have during the pendency of this litigation. The court’s ruling decided only the propriety of ORES’s adoption of the regulatory structure not its implementation. Therefore, future case-by-case, project-specific challenges could still be made with respect to how the ORES regulations have been implemented.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Brenda Colella, Regulatory Practice Group leader and Regulatory Practice Area co-chair, at bcolella@barclaydamon.com; Ekin Senlet, Regulatory Practice Area co-chair, at esenlet@barclaydamon.com; Yvonne Hennessey, Environmental Practice Area chair, at yhennessey@barclaydamon.com; Dan Krzykowski, associate, at dkrzyowski@barclaydamon.com; or another member of the firm’s Regulatory or Environmental Practice Areas.
 

Featured Media

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Primitivo Robles, Hannibal Wheatley, Valeria Jacobs, Marlelis Hernandez, and Omar Rodriguez—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

Hitting the Reset Button: Second Circuit Decision Highlights Significant Statute of Limitations Issues for New York Foreclosure Plaintiffs

Alerts

NYS Department of Health Publishes Adopted Cybersecurity Regulations for Hospitals

Alerts

USPTO Highlights Risks of Using AI for Inventive Process

Alerts

Navigating New York State's Expanded Regulatory Landscape: Implications for Health Care Transactions

Alerts

Mind the Gap: Recent UCC Filings Not Disclosed in a Search

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out