Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search


Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

March 26, 2020

COVID-19: DOJ and Other Regulators Warn of Hoarding, Price Gouging Amid Crisis

On Monday, President Trump signed Executive Order 13910 to prevent the hoarding and price gouging of health and medical resources that are necessary to respond to the spread of COVID-19 within the United States. Authorized under the Defense Production Act, this action is to help ensure that hospitals, first responders, doctors, and other providers receive sufficient and critical medical equipment.

Pursuant to the executive order, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary may designate certain resources as scarce or as threatened materials, which are materials that the supply of which would be threatened by excessive accumulation. The order prohibits any individual from accumulating designated materials in excess of the reasonable demands of business, personal, or home consumption or for the purpose of resale at prices in excess of prevailing market prices.

Some materials that have been determined by the HHS secretary to be needed to respond to COVID-19 and which are or are likely to be in short supply or would be considered threatened materials include:

  • Personal protective equipment (PPE), including facemasks, surgical masks, face shields, and gloves
  • Face piece respirators
  • Portable ventilators
  • Disinfecting devices
  • Medical gowns and apparel

A complete list of designated materials as of March 25 can be found here and is subject to periodic review by the secretary.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it will work with the HHS to vigorously enforce the anti-hoarding provisions of the executive order in cases where hoarding may impede the supply of health and medical resources needed to combat COVID-19. The DOJ also intends to prioritize the detection, investigation, and prosecution of fraudulent activity and price gouging related to medical resources necessary to respond to the crisis.

In New York State, the national emergency declaration by the HHS on January 31 triggered the state’s price gouging laws that prohibit selling goods or services to consumers in an affected area for an unconscionably excessive price (NY General Business Law § 396-r). A price is likely to be found “unconscionably excessive” if the price being charged by the seller during the national emergency event is grossly greater than the price charged immediately prior to the onset of the national emergency event by that same seller or the price being charged during the national emergency event grossly exceeds the price for the same or similar goods and services readily obtainable in the affected area by other consumers.

New Yorkers are encouraged to report sudden price increases in consumer goods such as hand sanitizer, cleaning supplies, and other health- and sanitation-related products by calling the consumer hotline at 800.697.1220 or submitting a complaint form online.

Authorities in states like Florida are also on high alert about price gouging as the number of COVID-19 cases continues to increase among a predominantly elderly population. Florida law prohibits price gouging during a state of emergency, which applies to essential goods such as food, water, gasoline, masks, and cleaning supplies. Since last week, Florida’s Consumer Protection Division has received approximately 357 consumer contacts about essential commodities and is actively investigating whether price gouging occurred.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Linda Clark, Health Care Controversies Team leader, at; Mary Connolly, associate, at or another member of the firm’s Health Care Controversies Team.


Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media


Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Compres, Sanchez, Fontanez, Pajaro, Garcia, and Jaquez—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits


Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Competello, Fernandez, Liz, Riley, and Trippett—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits


CDPAP Providers Get First Look at the Future of CDPAP Without FIs


New York State Fiscal Year 2025 Budget: Implications for Employers Unpacked


Lab Providers Under Increased Scrutiny From Civil and Criminal Agencies for OTC COVID-19 Test Claims


NYS Appellate Court Dismisses Claim Based on Material Misrepresentations in Insurance Application

We're Growing in DC!

We’re excited to announce Barclay Damon’s combination with Washington DC–based Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram. SLS’s 10 lawyers, three paralegals, and four administrative staff will join Barclay Damon while maintaining their current office in DC’s central business district. Our clients will benefit from SLS’s corporate, real estate, finance, and construction litigation experience and national energy-industry profile, and their clients from our full range of services.

Read More

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out