Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

October 10, 2025

Federal Court Narrows Scope of Insurers' Privilege Claims in COVID-19 Coverage Litigation

In a recent discovery ruling,1 the US District Court for the Southern District of New York addressed the limits of attorney-client privilege and document redactions in an ongoing dispute between Mandarin Oriental and its insurers, HDI and Generali. The case involves claims for business interruption losses arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mandarin challenged the insurers’ decision to redact substantial portions of internal communications and attachments, arguing that many of the withheld materials were factual or business-related in nature rather than privileged legal advice. The court reviewed a sample of these documents in camera (i.e., privately) and issued a detailed ruling clarifying what may and may not be withheld.

The court upheld redactions where documents reflected actual legal advice, such as summaries of outside counsel’s opinions or internal references to specific legal conclusions. For example, a section titled “Coverage Counsel Conclusion” and a formal legal memorandum from external attorneys were found to be appropriately protected by attorney-client privilege.

However, the court ordered the insurers to produce all other portions of the documents, including communications among non-lawyers and attachments that did not contain legal analysis. For example, communications concerning business strategy, factual details, internal signoffs, and claim handling were held to fall outside the scope of privilege.

The court emphasized that simply involving counsel or referencing legal risk does not automatically shield communications from discovery. Additionally, the court reiterated that the work product doctrine does not protect materials prepared in the ordinary course of business. Documents generated well in advance of any anticipated litigation (particularly more than one year before the lawsuit was filed) were not entitled to protection under that standard.

This ruling is important for both policyholders and insurers. It clarifies that attorney-client privilege is limited and cannot shield routine business communications. While legal advice remains protected, insurers cannot broadly withhold internal evaluations of claims. The decision improves policyholders’ access to key insurer communications and reminds insurers to clearly separate legal advice from business matters and apply redactions carefully.

We will continue to monitor this litigation and similar rulings that shape the scope of privilege and discovery in insurance coverage disputes.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Earl Storrs III, associate, at estorrs@barclaydamon.com; Tony Piazza or Mark Whitford, Insurance Coverage & Regulation Practice Area co-chairs, at apiazza@barclaydamon.com and mwhitford@barclaydamon.com; Matthew Larkin, Torts & Products Liability Defense Practice Area chair, at mlarkin@barclaydamon.com; or another member of the firm’s Insurance Coverage & Regulation or Torts & Products Liability Defense Practice Areas.
                                                                                                                  

1Mandarin Oriental, Inc. v. HDI Global Ins. Co., 2025 US Dist. LEXIS 116611 (SDNY June 18, 2025) 
 

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

Federal Court Narrows Scope of Insurers' Privilege Claims in COVID-19 Coverage Litigation

Alerts

AstraZeneca Escalates FARXIGA® Audit Demands: What Pharmacies Need to Know Now

Alerts

Update on the Evolving Guidance for H-1B Entry Restrictions Under September 19 Presidential Proclamation

Alerts

Attention Providers! OMIG Audit Update: New Settlement Flexibility at Lower Confidence Payment Restored and DME Protocol Released

Alerts

NYS Trial Court Holds: Animals Are Family Too

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Victor Lopez, Myrna Driffin, Damon Jones, Tazinique Echols, and Ashley Bahena—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits