Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Blog Post

April 14, 2017

CBP Statistics Show Steady Increase of Electronic Device Searches

On April 11, 2017, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) released statistics related to searches of electronic devices during the process of admitting individuals to the United States.  While less than 0.1% of total travelers may be subject to a search, comparing the statistics between the first six months of FY 2017 (October-March) and FY 2016, electronic device searches nearly doubled from 8,383 to 14,993.

CBP inspects approximately 1 million travelers to the U.S. every day. Approximately 2,500 electronic device searches including phones, computers and tablets, occurred on a monthly basis beginning in October 2016.  U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and visitors’ electronics may be subject to the search.  According to CBP, increased electronic device searches are driven by the mission to combat terrorism, child pornography, export controls violation, intellectual property rights infringement, and fraud.

It has long been held by the courts that the search and seizure clause under the Fourth Amendment does not apply to border searches, and that information on a traveler’s electronic devices, including electronically stored personal files, may be searched at random, without a warrant.  By applying for admission to the U.S., a traveler is subject to a search and does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Our best recommendation to avoid an electronic device search is to leave the devices at home, store data in cloud services, or bring a “clean device” when travelling across the border.

Featured Media

Alerts

Supreme Court Declines to Clarify Impact of Uninjured Class Members on Class Certification—For Now

Alerts

EPA Issues Memorandum Reminding States and Tribes of Their Limited Authority Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act

Alerts

Non-Judicial Collateral Remedies, Part 2 – Sale of Collateral

Alerts

NYS Court of Appeals Applies the Assumption of Risk Doctrine to One Golf Course Injury but Not Another

Alerts

Bankruptcy Avoidance Actions, Part 2 – Fraudulent Transfers

Alerts

NYS Court of Appeals: CVA Plaintiff Must Prove Notice of Abuse Applying Then-Prevailing Standards in Decades-Old Sexual Abuse Case