Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Podcast

April 7, 2022

Barclay Damon Live: Labor & Employment Podcast—"Can I Ask That, Bonus Episode: Exception to At-Will Employment in NYS"

In this brief episode of Barclay Damon Live: Labor & Employment Podcast, host Ari Kwiatkowski gives her last word (for now) on employment applications and employee handbooks, citing a niche 80s court decision having to do with an exception to New York’s at-will employment doctrine. In this case, Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, the court decided against the employer’s request to dismiss the case based on the plaintiff’s arguments that, despite the employee handbook stating that he could only be terminated for “just cause,” he had been terminated without just cause. With no employee contract or other formal agreement in place, the court found there was an implied employment contract. Something for employers to watch out for? Listen in for the details.

DISCLAIMER:

Barclay Damon Live podcast transcripts and captions are automatically generated through artificial intelligence, and the texts may not have been thoroughly reviewed. The authoritative record of Barclay Damon Live programming is the audio file.

This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion, and no attorney-client relationship has been established or implied. Thanks for listening.

Featured Media

Alerts

New York State Now Requires Public Bidders to Implement Protections Against Gender-Based Violence in the Workplace

Alerts

Successor Liability: The Catch Behind "Free and Clear" in Bankruptcy Sales

Alerts

New York Public Service Commission Issues Order Modifying the Coordinated Grid Planning Process

Alerts

RAPID Action: NYS Office of Renewable Energy Siting and Electric Transmission Issues Revised Proposed Rules and Regulations

Alerts

NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Violated State's Climate Act

Alerts

New York Appellate Court Addresses Application of Breach of Contract Exclusion in Insurance Coverage Dispute