Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Alert

Our attorneys stay on top of changes in legislation, agency regulations, case law, and industry trends—then craft timely legal alerts to keep clients up to date on legal developments important to their business.

October 30, 2024

Second Department: Objective Evidence Required to Establish Trivial Defect Defense

Generally, property owners may not be held liable for injuries caused by trivial defects that do not unreasonably imperil the safety of a pedestrian. In Snyder v. AFCO Avports Mgt., LLC,1 the Appellate Division, Second Department considered whether photographs alone are sufficient for a moving defendant to establish triviality, and, if they are, what they must depict to support such a finding. The court also reviewed the foundation necessary for admissibility of a human-factors expert’s opinion in support of the motion. 

In Snyder, the plaintiff sustained injuries after tripping over a piece of raised sidewalk. Photographs of the area were taken the same day, and repairs to the sidewalk were made in the days following the incident before any objective measurements were taken of the misleveled slab. 

The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, finding that the alleged defect was trivial upon review of the defendants’ submissions of photographs, deposition testimony, and an affidavit of a human-factors expert. The motion papers lacked objective evidence regarding the dimensions of the defect due to its speedy repair after the accident. The plaintiffs appealed, and the Second Department reversed.

The Second Department found that an objective measurement of a defect is not a per se requirement to establish triviality as a matter of law; however, the persuasiveness of photographs depends on the reasonable inferences drawn from them. Indistinct photographs, or photographs from which it is impossible to ascertain the extent of the height differential, do not aid a moving defendant in establishing triviality. 

The appellate court reasoned that, where no objective measurement is provided, the height, depth, or other dimensions of an alleged defect ideally should be viewed near other objects of known or standard size, such as a coin, or other objects of uniform size. The photographs submitted by the defendants did not enable a reasonable inference to be made of the alleged defect’s dimensions and “did not support the Supreme Court’s conclusion of triviality as a matter of law.”2 The Second Department also found that the opinion of the defendants’ human-factors expert was inadmissible “absent an objective measurement of the height differential or at least a fairly inferable estimate of it.”3

With the Snyder decision in mind, there will inevitably be situations where objective measurements are difficult to take, are forgotten, or are impossible to obtain due to repairs. The possibility remains that a photograph allowing for a reasonable inference of dimensions of the defect could support a finding of triviality, but practitioners are advised that the better course is to submit objective measurements of an alleged defect when relying on a trivial defect defense. 

If you have any questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact Matthew Larkin, Torts & Products Liability Defense Practice Area chair, at mlarkin@barclaydamon.com; Kaity McClaine, associate, at kmcclaine@barclaydamon.com; or another member of the firm’s Torts & Products Liability Defense Practice Area.
                                                                                          

1___AD3d___, 2024 NY Slip Op 04584 (2d Dep’t September 25, 2024).
2Id., at * 5. 
3Id., at *5-6.

Featured Media

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Wislande Claude, Felipe Fernandez, Howard Wilson, Lisa Cantwell, and Erika Alexandria—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

NYS Appellate Court Holds Family Members Are Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Signed by Deceased Relative

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Milagros Senior, Sylinia Jackson, Edery Herrera, Henry Tucker, and Carlton Knowles—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Phyllis Hampton, Nicolas Grant, Windy Lucius, Jesus Gonzalez, and James Watson—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

New York PSC Grants 30-Day Extension for NYSERDA to File First Bulk Energy Storage Solicitation

Alerts

Supreme Court Broadens Scope of Religious Exemption From State Regulation