Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Blog Post

March 18, 2016

New York's Appellate Court Rules that Public Health Law § 2801-d Applies Only to Nursing Homes

Public Health Law §2801-d creates a private right of action for residents of “residential health care facilities” thus enabling them to sue for deprivation of a right or benefit created for their well-being.  The statute allows for the recovery of compensatory damages, punitive damages, and even attorney fees.  It is largely responsible for the dramatic increase in civil lawsuits brought against New York’s nursing homes during the past decade.  There has been much uncertainty over the last several months as to whether the statute also applies to assisted living facilities.  New York’s Appellate Court, Second Department, recently clarified the issue in its decision of Novick v. South Nassau Communities Hospital, 2016 NY Slip Opinion 01304.

The Novick case involves a 75-year-old male with a multitude of health problems, including diabetes and multiple neck fractures he sustained during a motor vehicle accident.  Mr. Novick was admitted to the hospital for treatment of the neck fractures where he soon developed a stage III sacral ulcer.  He was eventually transferred to a nursing home where his sacral ulcer worsened to stage IV.  He eventually died from his injuries.

Mr. Novick’s estate subsequently brought an action against many of Mr. Novick’s medical providers, including the hospital and the nursing home.  The action was based on theories of medical malpractice, wrongful death and violations of Public Health §2801-d.  The hospital and the nursing home moved for summary judgment arguing that the ulcer was clinically unavoidable.  The hospital also argued that Public Health Law §2801-d did not apply to hospitals.  The trial court granted the defendants’ motions and the Appellate Court affirmed.  In its written decision, the Appellate Court, Second Department, specifically stated that Public Health Law §2801-d “applies only to Nursing Homes.”

The Novick decision is a good one for operators of assisted living facilities.  It is important to emphasize, however, that the issue has not yet been specifically decided by New York’s other three appellate courts or its highest court, the Court of Appeals.

Featured Media

Alerts

EPA Lists Two New "Forever Chemicals" Under CERCLA

Alerts

NYS Governor Hochul Announces Final RFP for New Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics

Alerts

The Second Department Affirms Successful Storm in Progress Defense of Slip and Fall Case

Alerts

The New York FY 2025 Budget – CDPAP FIs Under Threat

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Anderson, Beauchamp, Murray, Angeles, Monegro, and Bullock—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

Updated Bulletin on Tracking Technologies in the Health Care Industry

We're Growing in DC!

We’re excited to announce Barclay Damon’s combination with Washington DC–based Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram. SLS’s 10 lawyers, three paralegals, and four administrative staff will join Barclay Damon while maintaining their current office in DC’s central business district. Our clients will benefit from SLS’s corporate, real estate, finance, and construction litigation experience and national energy-industry profile, and their clients from our full range of services.

Read More

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out