Skip to Main Content
Services Talent Knowledge
Site Search
Menu

Podcast

February 24, 2022

Barclay Damon Live: Labor & Employment Podcast—"Can I Ask That: Job Postings and Applications, With Scott Rogoff"

In episode 12 of the Barclay Damon Live: Labor & Employment Podcast, host Ari Kwiatkowski welcomes Barclay Damon colleague Scott Rogoff for a three-part series: “Can I Ask That: Job Postings and Applications.” Ari and Scott lay the groundwork about the laws in play around job descriptions, applications, interviews, and job offers. They describe both traditional and newer protected groups of people, also known as classes, delving into the nuances of eliciting relevant information you need during an interview—and avoiding information you don’t need and questions you can’t ask. Listen closely for important tips, and tune in next time for part two with Scott and Ari.

DISCLAIMER:

Barclay Damon Live podcast transcripts and captions are automatically generated through artificial intelligence, and the texts may not have been thoroughly reviewed. The authoritative record of Barclay Damon Live programming is the audio file.

This material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion, and no attorney-client relationship has been established or implied. Thanks for listening.

Subscribe

Click here to sign up for alerts, blog posts, and firm news.

Featured Media

Alerts

FinCEN Issues Response to Nationwide Injunction on the Corporate Transparency Act

Alerts

Fake Consumer Reviews, Testimonials, and Influence Indicators: Prohibitions and Penalties Under the Federal Trade Commission's Rule

Alerts

Personal Financial Data Rights Rule: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Compliance

Alerts

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Several "Tester" Plaintiffs—Paradise Morgan, Timothy Hernandez, Erika Alexandria, Denise Crumwell, and Eugene Duncan—Targeting Businesses in Recent Flurry of Lawsuits

Alerts

Nationwide Injunction on the Corporate Transparency Act

Alerts

Second Circuit Holds That a Default Judgment by an Insurer Against Insured Did Not Preclude Claims by Other Parties

This site uses cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site and in some cases direct advertisements to you based upon your use of our site.

By clicking [I agree], you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For information on what cookies we use and how to manage our use of cookies, please visit our Privacy Statement.

I AgreeOpt-Out